Skip to main content
Texas Supreme Court· 12/16/2011

Minton v. Gunn

Citations

  • 355 S.W.3d 634
  • 55 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 196
  • 2011 Tex. LEXIS 938
  • 2011 WL 6276121

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that plaintiff was required to prove that federal issue was “legally and factually viable”
  • discussing Air Measurement Technologies, Inc. v. Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, L. L. P., 504 F. 3d 1262 (2007); Immunocept, LLC v. Fulbright & Jaworski, LLP, 504 F. 3d 1281 (2007)
  • noting that dispute was “predominately one of fact”
  • “patent litigants have an interest in the uniform application of patent law by courts well-versed in that subject matter”
  • “because the success of Minton’s malpractice claim is reliant upon the viability of the experimental use exception as a defense to the on-sale bar, we hold that it is a substantial federal issue”
  • dis- cussing Air Measurement Technologies, Inc. v. Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, L. L. P., 504 F. 3d 1262 (2007); Immunocept, LLC v. Fulbright & Jaworski, LLP, 504 F. 3d 1281 (2007)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Green, Guzman, Hecht, Jefferson, Johnson, Lehrmann, Medina, Wainwright, Willett

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Minton v. Gunn

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.