Skip to main content

Minor v. State

Citations

  • 641 N.E.2d 85
  • 1994 Ind. App. LEXIS 1436
  • 1994 WL 566450

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that defense counsel’s failure to reiterate to the trial court an already-rejected argument regarding the exclusion of evidence was not prejudicial to the defendant
  • holding that “remand is not necessary where the facts underlying the claims are not in dispute and the issues are clear” and reviewing the petitioner’s allegations in his brief

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baker, Najam, Kirsch

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.