Skip to main content
· 1/17/1996

Gustman v. State

Citations

  • 660 N.E.2d 353
  • 1996 Ind. App. LEXIS 16
  • 1996 WL 13789

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the defendant’s argument that the trial court violated his constitutional rights by ordering that he pay child support as a condition of probation immediately upon his release from incarceration was not ripe for appellate review
  • addressing child support as a condition of probation but not specifically mentioning Section 35-838-2-3(f

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Robertson, Najam, Hoffman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.