· 1/17/1996
Gustman v. State
Citations
- 660 N.E.2d 353
- 1996 Ind. App. LEXIS 16
- 1996 WL 13789
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that the defendant’s argument that the trial court violated his constitutional rights by ordering that he pay child support as a condition of probation immediately upon his release from incarceration was not ripe for appellate review
- addressing child support as a condition of probation but not specifically mentioning Section 35-838-2-3(f
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Robertson, Najam, Hoffman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.