Mingo v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that where appellant filed his pro se motion to withdraw plea after he filed his notice of appeal, the trial court lacked jurisdiction to consider the motion and should have dismissed rather than denied it
• remanding for trial court to withdraw order denying pro se motion to withdraw plea and to enter order striking the motion as unauthorized pursuant to Sharp and Mourra
• “Because Mingo filed his pro se motion to withdraw plea after he filed his notice of appeal, the trial court was without jurisdiction to consider that motion.”
• “Because Mingo filed his pro se motion to withdraw plea after he filed his notice of appeal, the trial court was without jurisdiction to consider that motion.” (citing Sharp v. State, 884 So.2d 510, 512 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Adkinson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-05-28· cited 5×
• Williams v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-01-04· cited 2×
• Young v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-03-14· cited 2×
• Gipson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-02-03· cited 2×
• Hawthorne v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-05-26· cited 1×
• Hines v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-03-25· cited 1×
• ALLON NAVARRO v. STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2024-04-03
• Clark v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2025-07-09

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Anders v. California
  Supreme Court· 1967-05-08· cited 87,848×
• Mourra v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-09-08· cited 34×
• Sharp v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-10-13· cited 18×