ALLON NAVARRO v. STATE OF FLORIDA

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that notice was sufficiently specific where the defendant, after receiving notice, took immediate steps to cure the problems identified in the notice letter
• holding that plaintiff's notice of specific violations at defendant's outfall 3 was sufficient to encompass later violations at outfall 4 when the defendant's actions — rerouting to outfall 4 — showed that the notice provided the defendant with sufficient information to correct the violation
• finding earlier pre-suit notice sufficient for new violations alleged in amended complaint where the source of violations was adequately disclosed
• re-routing its effluent after receiving notice was not the action “of a company that has not received enough information for the purposes of the statutory notice provisions of the [CWA]”
• “The key to notice is to give the accused company the opportunity to correct the problem.”
• Seventh Circuit decision holding that a notice letter for discharge of contaminated water continued to be effective where the defendant redirected the discharge to a different location after receiving the letter

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).