Millspaugh v. Millspaugh

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that time of discovery is a question for the fact-finder where “the facts are susceptible to opposing inferences”
• stating that time of discovery is a question for the fact-finder where \the facts are susceptible to opposing inferences\
• stating that knowledge of the running of the statute of limitations is \a question of fact to be determined by the jury or trial court after a full hearing where . . . the facts are susceptible to opposing inferences\ (internal quotation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Oak Grove Investors v. Bell & Gossett Co.
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1983-08-31· cited 72×
• Siragusa v. Brown
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1998-12-30· cited 66×
• Bemis v. Estate of Bemis
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1998-11-25· cited 60×
• Greene v. Wyeth
  D. Nevada· 2004-10-29· cited 24×
• Shupe v. Ham
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1982-01-28· cited 15×
• Sierra Diesel Injection Service v. Burroughs Corp.
  D. Nevada· 1987-01-28· cited 7×
• Nevada Power Co. v. Monsanto Company
  Ninth Circuit· 1992-04-14
• Jones v. Nev. Comm'n on Jud. Discipline
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2014-02-27
• Mahon Vs. Howard & Howard Attorneys, Pllc C/W 81468
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2021-11-30

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Hobart v. Hobart Estate Co.
  California Supreme Court· 1945-05-29· cited 327×
• Dredge Corporation v. Wells Cargo, Inc.
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1964-02-20· cited 27×
• Howard v. Howard
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1952-01-17· cited 16×
• Golden Nugget, Inc. v. Ham
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1979-01-17· cited 16×