Oak Grove Investors v. Bell & Gossett Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that where the \catch all\ statute of limitations, NRS 11.220, was silent as to time of accrual, the discovery rule would apply
• holding that where the “catch all” statute of limitations, NRS 11.220, was silent as to time of accrual, the discovery rule would apply
• concluding that the economic loss doctrine did not bar recovery for negligence when the appellant alleged that a defective plumbing and heating system caused water leakage throughout and damage to the appellant's apartment
• concluding that the economic loss doctrine did not bar recovery for negligence when the appellant alleged that a defective plumbing and heating system caused water leakage throughout and damage to the appellant’s apartment
• placing the burden of demonstrating the absence of a genuine issue of material fact as to when a party discovered or should have discovered the facts underlying a claim on the party seeking summary judgment on statute-of-limitations grounds
• \When the plaintiff knew or in the exercise of proper diligence should have known of the facts constituting the elements of his cause of action is a question of fact for the trier of fact.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).