Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 5/4/2009
Miller v. State
Citations
- 970 A.2d 332
- 185 Md. App. 293
- 2009 Md. App. LEXIS 57
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that the Supreme Court “observed,” as opposed to “held,” that “it may be appropriate to presume that in most cases defense counsel routinely explain the nature of the offense”
- “An accused can understand the terms of a plea agreement without knowing the nature and elements of the charge to which the plea applies.”
- \An accused can understand the terms of a plea agreement without knowing the nature and elements of the charge to which the plea applies.\
- “The appellant filed a timely notice of appeal, which this Court treated as an application for leave to appeal[.]”
- “The Court said nothing about the presumption language it had used in Henderson (or in Lonberger). That is not surprising, however, because the facts in Bradshaw supported a ‘knowledge of nature and elements of the crime’ finding without applying any such presumption.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Eyler, Wright, Sharer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. DaughtryCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2011-04-25· cited 56×
- Grandison v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2012-02-22· cited 20×
- Graves v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2013-12-18· cited 17×
- Gross v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2009-06-11· cited 11×
- Malvo v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2026-05-01
Cites
36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court· 1969-06-02· cited 12,640×
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court· 1970-11-23· cited 9,465×
- Marshall v. LonbergerSupreme Court· 1983-02-22· cited 1,618×
- Henderson v. MorganSupreme Court· 1976-06-17· cited 1,382×
- Bradshaw v. StumpfSupreme Court· 2005-06-13· cited 540×
- State v. CroweTennessee Supreme Court· 2005-08-16· cited 153×
- Harris v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1985-09-09· cited 91×
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2000-05-02· cited 89×
- Metheny v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2000-07-24· cited 81×
- State v. ReidSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2006-04-18· cited 77×
- Warfield v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1989-03-29· cited 76×
- United States v. Melvin C. WetterlinSeventh Circuit· 1978-09-27· cited 74×
- State v. PrietCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1981-01-14· cited 67×
- Thanos v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1993-04-05· cited 64×
- Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1976-07-07· cited 62×
- Stevens v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1963-06-17· cited 61×
- Bryan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 1992-08-12· cited 55×
- John David Stumpf v. Betty Mitchell, WardenSixth Circuit· 2004-04-28· cited 37×
- Waits v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado· 1986-09-29· cited 33×
- Yoswick v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1997-09-17· cited 29×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.