Skip to main content

Bryan v. State

Citations

  • 848 S.W.2d 72
  • 1992 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 679

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that when a petitioner attacks the competency of trial counsel in post-conviction proceedings, the attorney-client privilege “is viewed as waived regarding the representation in issue”
  • holding the party asserting attorney-client privilege has the burden of establishing its existence
  • stating that advice about minimum and maximum punishments is not constitutionally based
  • rejecting the defendant’s claim that he had not understood the nature of the offenses to which he had pleaded guilty and noting that the elements of the offenses had been alleged in the indictment
  • rejecting the defendant's claim that he had not understood the nature of the offenses to which he had pleaded guilty and noting that the elements of the offenses had been alleged in the indictment
  • setting out a three-part test for when a party waives attorney-client privilege under Tennessee law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tipton, Dwyer, Peay

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

49 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.