Miller v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• sufficient testimonial evidence to permit judge, sitting as fact-finder, to conclude that gun was used in robbery

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Lodowski v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1986-08-22· cited 91×
• Mefford and Blackburn v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1964-07-07· cited 74×
• Bean v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1964-04-28· cited 71×
• State v. Padilla
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1976-07-12· cited 42×
• Brooks v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1989-02-03· cited 40×
• Couplin v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1977-10-18· cited 25×
• Crum v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1967-03-31· cited 14×
• Hof v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1993-12-10· cited 8×
• Miller v. Warden
  D. Maryland· 1963-10-30

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Vincent v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1959-06-09· cited 82×
• Day v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1950-11-15· cited 72×
• Driver v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2001-10-16· cited 60×
• Hayes v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2001-10-04· cited 40×
• Dyson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1961-06-16· cited 15×