Hawaii Supreme Court· 7/12/1976
State v. Padilla
Citations
- 552 P.2d 357
- 57 Haw. 150
- 1976 Haw. LEXIS 123
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that the cross-examination, the arguments made to the jury, and the rest of the jury instructions adequately directed the jury's attention to the identification evidence, rendering a more specific instruction unnecessary
- stating that the cross-examination, the arguments made to the jury, and the rest of the jury instructions adequately directed the jury’s attention to the identification evidence, rendering a more specific instruction unnecessary
- adopting the Neil v. Biggers factors
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Richardson, Kobayashi, Ogata, Menor, Kidwell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. MainaaupoHawaii Supreme Court· 2008-03-05· cited 220×
- State v. OkumuraHawaii Supreme Court· 1995-05-04· cited 181×
- State v. LaureanoWashington Supreme Court· 1984-06-07· cited 138×
- State v. WakisakaHawaii Supreme Court· 2003-10-23· cited 91×
- State v. ValdiviaHawaii Supreme Court· 2001-06-07· cited 86×
- State v. DyleTennessee Supreme Court· 1995-05-15· cited 82×
- State v. MelearHawaii Supreme Court· 1981-06-30· cited 79×
- State v. CabagbagHawaii Supreme Court· 2012-05-17· cited 46×
- State v. VingeHawaii Supreme Court· 1996-05-13· cited 31×
- State v. PahioHawaii Supreme Court· 1977-09-09· cited 25×
- State v. Tsujimura.Hawaii Supreme Court· 2017-05-31· cited 24×
- State v. NapulouHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 1997-04-09· cited 23×
- State v. RodriguesHawaii Supreme Court· 2006-11-29· cited 22×
- State v. BennettHawaii Supreme Court· 1980-04-29· cited 20×
- State v. Yutaka MitakeHawaii Supreme Court· 1981-12-29· cited 17×
- People v. HurleyCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1979-08-08· cited 16×
- State v. MalaniHawaii Supreme Court· 1978-05-02· cited 11×
- State v. HarperHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 1980-12-12· cited 8×
- State v. Cabinatan.Hawaii Supreme Court· 2014-01-30· cited 6×
- State v. GrayHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 2005-07-01· cited 4×
Cites
27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court· 1972-12-06· cited 7,056×
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1968-03-18· cited 6,700×
- United States v. AshSupreme Court· 1973-06-21· cited 868×
- United States v. Melvin TelfaireD.C. Circuit· 1972-06-19· cited 477×
- United States v. Manuel P. AmaralNinth Circuit· 1973-12-03· cited 237×
- United States v. BarberThird Circuit· 1971-04-14· cited 146×
- State v. ClawansSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1962-07-03· cited 138×
- Loy Lavator Baker v. United StatesFifth Circuit· 1969-07-30· cited 133×
- United States v. Fred FernandezSecond Circuit· 1972-02-24· cited 111×
- Raymond John Wagner, Anthony Joseph Cambiano and Donald Vandergrift v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1959-04-07· cited 77×
- United States v. Robert John EvansSecond Circuit· 1973-09-19· cited 77×
- United States v. William WrightSeventh Circuit· 1962-12-12· cited 48×
- State v. TaylorArizona Supreme Court· 1973-04-02· cited 38×
- United States v. Samuel Marshall and William Hazel Peterkin, Jr.Second Circuit· 1970-06-01· cited 36×
- United States v. C. L. MossThird Circuit· 1969-06-27· cited 31×
- United States v. Abel Montoya Sambrano and Johnnie Rodriguez PadillaNinth Circuit· 1974-11-12· cited 28×
- Bary v. United StatesTenth Circuit· 1957-08-23· cited 27×
- John Joseph Walsh v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1967-02-13· cited 25×
- Pierre v. GallowayLouisiana Court of Appeal· 1957-06-28· cited 22×
- State v. IrebariaHawaii Supreme Court· 1974-03-14· cited 21×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.