Miller v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that defendants sentencing claims warranted review even if \moot because they challenge an activity that is capable of repetition yet evades review\
• noting that defendants sentencing claims warranted review even if \moot because they challenge an activity that is capable of repetition yet evades review\
• interpreting language in former NRS 193.130(2)(e), which provided that a person convicted of category E felony be sentenced to prison \for a minimum term of 1 year and a maximum term of 4 years\ as requiring a . . • continued correct illegal sentence at any time

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Haney v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2008-06-12· cited 27×
• VALDEZ-JIMENEZ (JOSE) VS. DIST. CT. (STATE) C/W 76845
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2020-04-09
• Daniels v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1999-11-29

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Robert E. v. JUSTICE COURT OF RENO TP.
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1983-06-09· cited 55×
• Creps v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1978-06-28· cited 19×
• Igbinovia v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1995-05-25· cited 17×
• Sandy v. Fifth Judicial District Court
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1997-03-27· cited 15×
• Koerschner v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1995-03-30· cited 8×
• State v. WASHOE COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDER
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1989-06-01· cited 6×
• Walsh v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1994-12-22· cited 2×