Skip to main content
· 6/9/1983

Robert E. v. JUSTICE COURT OF RENO TP.

Citations

  • 664 P.2d 957
  • 99 Nev. 443
  • 1983 Nev. LEXIS 464

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • providing that an ambiguous statute \can be construed in line with what reason and public policy would indicate the legislature intended\ (internal quotation marks omitted)
  • looking to legislative history, reason, and public policy to determine legislative intent behind ambiguous statute
  • “A statute is ambiguous, however, only if it is subject to more than one reasonable interpretation.”
  • certification as an adult only applies to specific charge administered in district court
  • “When presented with a question of statutory interpretation, the intent of the legislature is the controlling factor and, if the statute under consideration is clear on its face, a court can not go beyond the statute in determining legislative intent.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Manoukian, Springer, Mowbray, Steffen, Gunderson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.