· 6/9/1983
Robert E. v. JUSTICE COURT OF RENO TP.
Citations
- 664 P.2d 957
- 99 Nev. 443
- 1983 Nev. LEXIS 464
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- providing that an ambiguous statute \can be construed in line with what reason and public policy would indicate the legislature intended\ (internal quotation marks omitted)
- looking to legislative history, reason, and public policy to determine legislative intent behind ambiguous statute
- “A statute is ambiguous, however, only if it is subject to more than one reasonable interpretation.”
- certification as an adult only applies to specific charge administered in district court
- “When presented with a question of statutory interpretation, the intent of the legislature is the controlling factor and, if the statute under consideration is clear on its face, a court can not go beyond the statute in determining legislative intent.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Manoukian, Springer, Mowbray, Steffen, Gunderson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.