Skip to main content

Miller v. State

Citations

  • 613 So. 2d 530
  • 1993 WL 15637

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that defendant’s firing a warning shot in the air when the victim allegedly advanced on him with a stick, constituted the use of deadly force as a matter of law
  • concluding that the trial court did not err in refusing to give a jury instruction on the justifiable use of non-deadly force, because a firearm is, by definition, a deadly weapon which fires projectiles likely to cause death or great bodily harm
  • explaining that discharging a firearm in the air as a warning shot constitutes the use of deadly force
  • the firing of a firearm into the air, even as a so called warning shot, constitutes the use of deadly force as a matter of law
  • the firing of a firearm into the air, even as a so called warning shot, constitutes the use of deadly force as a matter of law
  • “A firearm is, by definition, a deadly weapon which fires projectiles likely to cause death or great bodily harm; . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hubbart, Nesbitt and Baskin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.