Skip to main content

Miller v. Miller

Citations

  • 577 A.2d 205
  • 395 Pa. Super. 255
  • 1990 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1359

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that a continuance was properly denied where the trial court informed the appellant “that a continuance would be granted if he obtained a medical excuse outlining his ill health” and the appellant “failed to secure an excuse [or] attend the hearing.”
  • providing that immediate offset method was appropriate because “[i]t gave finality to the matter and there was sufficient property other than the pension to render the more cumbersome deferred distribution method unnecessary”
  • describing deferred distribution method as “reserved jurisdiction method”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wieand, Tamilia, Popovich

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.