Miller Const. Co. v. First Indus. Technology Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the doctrine of partial performance does not apply to personal service contracts

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Collier v. Brooks
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-02-11· cited 18×
• Doltz v. Harris & Associates
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 2003-08-13· cited 15×
• Sanz v. RT Aerospace Corp.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-02-15· cited 13×
• Moneyhun v. Vital Industries, Inc.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-01-11· cited 11×
• LaRue v. Kalex Construction & Development, Inc.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-08-22· cited 6×
• Shiley v. North American Directories
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-04-12

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Tobin & Tobin Insurance Agency, Inc. v. Zeskind
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1975-06-24· cited 49×
• Falovitch v. GUNN & GUNN CONST. CO.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1977-05-04· cited 20×
• Evans v. Parker
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-11-16· cited 19×
• Fell v. Messeroff
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1962-09-25· cited 12×
• Elliott v. Timmons
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-01-22· cited 11×
• Brown v. Cox
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1970-09-16· cited 10×
• Mongiovi v. Doerner
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1976-03-08· cited 9×
• Johnson v. Edwards
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-11-15· cited 8×
• O'Kon and Co., Inc. v. Riedel
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-03-31· cited 6×
• Wilson v. Hardy
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1957-12-04· cited 1×