Elliott v. Timmons

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “It is well-established that partial or complete performance removes an oral contract from the statute of frauds.” (citing Futch, 511 So.2d at 319)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Charles W. Dwight, Iii, Cross-Appellant v. Joan F. Tobin, Howard N. Ellman, Cross-Appellees
  Eleventh Circuit· 1991-12-27· cited 31×
• Collier v. Brooks
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-02-11· cited 18×
• Hospital Corp. v. ASSOC. IN ADOL. PSYCHIATRY
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-09-23· cited 11×
• Moneyhun v. Vital Industries, Inc.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-01-11· cited 11×
• WHARFSIDE v. Superior Bank
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-07-07· cited 9×
• Vargas v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-11-28· cited 9×
• White Construction Co. v. Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.
  M.D. Florida· 2009-04-07· cited 8×
• Miller Const. Co. v. First Indus. Technology Corp.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-02-19· cited 6×
• Ala v. Chesser
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-02-17· cited 5×
• Loper v. Weather Shield Manufacturing, Inc.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-06-24

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Futch v. Head
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-05-18· cited 47×
• Miller v. Murray
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1953-12-11· cited 39×
• WBD, INC. v. Howard Johnson Co.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1980-04-25· cited 29×
• Crews v. Woods
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1952-06-13· cited 15×
• Gleason v. Leadership Housing, Inc.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1976-01-16· cited 5×