Mill-Run Tours, Inc. v. Khashoggi

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the convenience of counsel is less important than the hardship imposed on the parties
• ordering defendants to travel to New York for depositions, noting reasons such as cost, litigation efficiency, and convenience
• considering these three factors in ruling on a motion for a protective order
• considering these three factors in ruling on a motion for a protective order
• “Although less important than any hardship on the parties, the convenience of counsel should be taken into account.”
• defendants’ residences unclear, but purported by the defendants to be “in Europe and other foreign countries”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Unnamed case
  Second Circuit· 2003-11-21· cited 135×
• Six West Retail Acquisition, Inc. v. Sony Theatre Management Corp.
  S.D. New York· 2001-09-06· cited 29×
• Zito v. Leasecomm Corp.
  S.D. New York· 2006-02-10· cited 24×
• United States v. One Gulfstream G-V Jet Aircraft Displaying Tail Number VPCES
  District of Columbia· 2014-05-09· cited 19×
• Securities & Exchange Commission v. Aly
  S.D. New York· 2017-03-01· cited 18×
• Trans Pacific Insurance v. Trans-Pacific Insurance
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1991-02-05· cited 17×
• Custom Form Manufacturing, Inc. v. Omron Corp.
  N.D. Indiana· 2000-09-12· cited 12×
• Hallwood Realty Partners, L.P. v. Gotham Partners, L.P.
  S.D. New York· 2000-07-10· cited 10×
• Estate of Gerasimenko v. Cape Wind Trading Co.
  S.D. New York· 2011-03-17· cited 9×
• Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Sterling Jewelers, Inc.
  W.D. New York· 2014-03-10· cited 3×
• Yaskawa Electric Corp. v. Kollmorgen Corp.
  N.D. Illinois· 2001-06-07· cited 3×
• Hechinger Investment Co. of Delaware, Inc. v. Friedman
  Second Circuit· 2003-11-21· cited 1×
• OKADA VS. DIST. C T. (WYNN RESORTS, LTD.)
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2015-10-15