N.D. Indiana· 9/12/2000

Custom Form Manufacturing, Inc. v. Omron Corp.

Citations

196 F.R.D. 333
47 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1214
2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13483
2000 WL 1290613

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

finding, in the corporate context: “When a foreign corporation is doing business in the United States, is subject to the court’s jurisdiction, and has freely taken advantage of our federal rules of discovery, exceptions to the general rule on the location of depositions are often made”
“If a federal court compels discovery on foreign soil, foreign judicial sovereignty may be infringed . . .” (citation omitted)
Rule 30(b)(6) depositions would occur in Illinois or Indiana because proceeding in principal place of business in Japan would compromise the court's authority to resolve discovery disputes and raise sovereignty issues
“[A] foreign corporation, subject to the in personam jurisdiction of this court, can be ordered under Rule 30(b)(6) to produce its officers, directors or managing agents in the United States to give deposition testimony.”
collecting No. 13-3898 11 cases

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nuechterlein

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.