Milburn v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “This decision is a prime example of a strategic choice made after a less than adequate investigation which, therefore, is not supported by informed professional judgment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Ex Parte Taylor
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2001-02-28· cited 211×
• Milburn v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2000-04-13· cited 130×
• Michael Jason Tucker v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2014-10-08· cited 18×
• Sanders Marquise Anderson v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2007-03-15
• Danny Lane Dillon v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 12th Dist. (Tyler)· 2007-11-30
• Clara Marie Allen v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2009-04-28
• Darrell Brown v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso)· 2014-01-15
• Jose Angel Acosta A/K/A Joe Angel Acosta v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2014-09-04
• Solomon Hailu Solomon v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2014-12-30
• Heath Hunsaker v. State of Arkansas
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2025-01-29

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Strickland v. Washington
  Supreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
• Hernandez v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1999-04-14· cited 1,653×
• Ex Parte Duffy
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1980-10-01· cited 683×
• Milburn v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 1998-06-04· cited 10×