Skip to main content

Middleton v. Middleton

Citations

  • 314 S.E.2d 362
  • 227 Va. 82
  • 1984 Va. LEXIS 271

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that England is equivalent of statutory “home state”
  • noting that the form of an order is relevant when deciding whether a court made an initial child custody determination as defined by the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act (UCCJA), the predecessor to the UCCJEA
  • finding England the \equivalent of statutory `home state'\ because \English procedural and substantive law of child custody was `reasonably comparable' to the law of Virginia\
  • applying UCCJA home state analysis to international child custody dispute because the general policies of the Virginia version of UCCJA “ ‘extend[ed] to the international area’ ”
  • noting that the United States Supreme Court had not clarified whether full faith and credit applied to custody decrees, which in part prompted the creation of the model for the UCCJA and the UCCJEA, while declining to address the impact of the Parental Kidnapping Prevention Act
  • applying the abuse of discretion standard

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Compton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

37 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.