Supreme Court of Virginia· 3/9/1984
Middleton v. Middleton
Citations
- 314 S.E.2d 362
- 227 Va. 82
- 1984 Va. LEXIS 271
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that England is equivalent of statutory “home state”
- noting that the form of an order is relevant when deciding whether a court made an initial child custody determination as defined by the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act (UCCJA), the predecessor to the UCCJEA
- finding England the \equivalent of statutory `home state'\ because \English procedural and substantive law of child custody was `reasonably comparable' to the law of Virginia\
- applying UCCJA home state analysis to international child custody dispute because the general policies of the Virginia version of UCCJA “ ‘extend[ed] to the international area’ ”
- noting that the United States Supreme Court had not clarified whether full faith and credit applied to custody decrees, which in part prompted the creation of the model for the UCCJA and the UCCJEA, while declining to address the impact of the Parental Kidnapping Prevention Act
- applying the abuse of discretion standard
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Compton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
37 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Farley v. FarleyCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1990-01-23· cited 637×
- Lutes v. AlexanderCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1992-08-25· cited 158×
- Yurgel v. YurgelSupreme Court of Florida· 1990-11-01· cited 65×
- Ann C. Meade v. Frank O. MeadeFourth Circuit· 1987-03-03· cited 42×
- Jean Fawcett v. Colin McRoberts Tammy McRobertsFourth Circuit· 2003-04-15· cited 35×
- Malik v. MalikCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1994-03-30· cited 28×
- Amin v. BakhatySupreme Court of Louisiana· 2001-10-16· cited 27×
- Ivaldi v. IvaldiSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1996-12-23· cited 27×
- Johnson v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1997-12-09· cited 26×
- In Re Marriage of RichardsonAppellate Court of Illinois· 1993-12-27· cited 26×
- Delk v. GonzalezMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1995-12-13· cited 23×
- Miller v. MillerSupreme Court of Vermont· 2008-08-22· cited 18×
- D'Agnese v. D'AgneseCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1996-03-19· cited 16×
- Ruppen v. RuppenIndiana Court of Appeals· 1993-05-25· cited 15×
- Beatrice H. v. Joan H.California Court of Appeal· 1987-12-16· cited 15×
- James F. Scott v. Jean Hall RutherfoordCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1999-07-06· cited 14×
- State Ex Rel. Griffin v. District Court of Fifth DistrictWyoming Supreme Court· 1992-05-04· cited 13×
- Yost v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Delaware· 1991-04-12· cited 13×
- Chaddick v. MonopoliSupreme Court of Florida· 1998-06-12· cited 11×
- Swalef v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2007-06-26· cited 8×
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- New York Ex Rel. Halvey v. HalveySupreme Court· 1947-03-31· cited 419×
- Ford v. FordSupreme Court· 1962-12-10· cited 137×
- Kovacs v. BrewerSupreme Court· 1958-05-26· cited 132×
- Kern v. LindseySupreme Court of Virginia· 1944-06-22· cited 26×
- Oehl v. OehlSupreme Court of Virginia· 1980-11-26· cited 21×
- Falco v. GrillsSupreme Court of Virginia· 1968-06-10· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.