Skip to main content
· 7/6/1999

James F. Scott v. Jean Hall Rutherfoord

Citations

  • 30 Va. App. 176
  • 516 S.E.2d 176
  • 1999 Va. App. LEXIS 419

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[I]t is the public’s perception of bias, not a litigant’s personal perception, that a judge must consider when determining whether recusal is necessary to preserve the integrity of the judicial system.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Annunziata, Elder, Willis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.