Mickenheim v. Cathcart

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• dicta; attorney fees for obtaining alimony judgment included in garnishment of seaman's wages where Congress was \particularly careful\ to expressly except enforcement of support obligations from the exemption afforded in 46 U.S.C. § 601

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Mahone v. Mahone
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1973-12-08· cited 39×
• Ex Parte Griggs
  Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 1983-06-24· cited 15×
• Stoltz v. Stoltz
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1964-05-27· cited 10×
• Laurencic v. Jones
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1965-12-06· cited 9×
• Thibodeaux v. Thibodeaux
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1984-06-25· cited 7×
• Rennebaum v. Rennebaum
  New York Supreme Court· 1959-12-08· cited 2×
• Door County Memorial Hospital v. Cole
  Ohio Court of Appeals· 1960-12-21· cited 2×
• Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc. v. Hill
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1966-01-19
• University of South Alabama v. John E. Graham & Sons
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1987-12-04

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Benedict v. Holmes
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1900-11-15· cited 34×
• Glorioso v. Glorioso
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1953-04-27· cited 27×
• Hannah v. Hannah
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1940-11-13· cited 20×
• Mickenheim v. Cathcart
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1954-04-12· cited 2×

Other cases named Mickenheim v. Cathcart

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Mickenheim v. Cathcart
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1954-04-12· cited 2×