Supreme Court of Kansas· 12/8/1973
Mahone v. Mahone
Citations
- 517 P.2d 131
- 213 Kan. 346
- 1973 Kan. LEXIS 639
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- allowing attachment despite exemption statute accomplishes purpose of exemption statute and furthers public policy which protects child’s right to receive support from his or her parent
- allowing attachment despite exemption statute accomplishes purpose of exemption statute and furthers public policy which protects child's right to receive support from his or her parent
- accumulated funds due and owing from KPERS may be reached to satisfy child support orders; K.S.A. 74-4923 exemption not applicable
- statutory exemption of pension funds from “execution, garnishment, or attachment, or any other process or claim whatsoever” not applicable when in conflict with enforcement of a decree or claim for child support
- “we have applied the principle that a statute is not to be given an arbitrary construction, according to the strict letter, but one that will advance the sense and meaning fairly deducible from the context”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Prager, Fromme, Schroeder
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Cartledge v. MillerS.D. New York· 1978-09-05· cited 68×
- Young v. YoungSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-02-15· cited 54×
- Udall Ex Rel. State Treasurer v. UdallSupreme Court of Oklahoma· 1980-06-24· cited 51×
- Faus v. FausSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1982-05-21· cited 42×
- Anthis v. CoplandWashington Supreme Court· 2012-02-16· cited 37×
- Stokes v. StokesCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1984-09-11· cited 33×
- D'Avignon v. GrahamNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1991-11-07· cited 32×
- Collida v. CollidaCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1977-02-03· cited 31×
- Cain v. CainTex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso)· 1988-02-10· cited 30×
- Baker v. R. D. Andersen Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Kansas· 1982-05-20· cited 18×
- In Re the Marriage of SedbrookCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 1992-03-13· cited 16×
- Mendenhall v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 1992-05-01· cited 16×
- Mariche v. MaricheSupreme Court of Kansas· 1988-07-08· cited 12×
- Jenkins v. HodesD. Kansas· 2002-12-20· cited 11×
- In Re BreauD. Maine· 1982-02-17· cited 9×
- Pope v. PopeCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1978-09-14· cited 9×
- In the Interest of D.V.Court of Appeals of Kansas· 1993-01-08· cited 9×
- In Re the Marriage of JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 1994-04-08· cited 8×
- In Re the Marriage of SchonemanCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 1989-06-02· cited 7×
- Brown v. TubbsCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 1978-09-01· cited 7×
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Civil Rights CasesSupreme Court· 1883-10-15· cited 999×
- McAllister v. FairSupreme Court of Kansas· 1906-01-06· cited 57×
- Fischer v. FischerSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1953-06-25· cited 43×
- Ogle v. HeimCalifornia Supreme Court· 1968-07-10· cited 31×
- Utley v. UtleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1969-03-10· cited 16×
- Johnson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Kansas· 1903-04-11· cited 14×
- Southwest State Bank v. QuinnSupreme Court of Kansas· 1967-03-04· cited 13×
- Mickenheim v. CathcartSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1955-12-12· cited 11×
- McDonald v. McDonaldMichigan Supreme Court· 1987-11-25· cited 10×
- Deem v. MillikinOhio Circuit Courts· 1892-05-15· cited 5×
- Violante v. Ronald's Hair Fashions, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1973-12-24· cited 1×
Other cases named Mahone v. Mahone
2 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.