Michel v. Nalber

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that “[g]lamesmanship” in discovery “is not allowed”
• “Rule 26(g) is designed to curb discovery abuse by explicitly encouraging the imposition of sanctions.”
• “The signing requirement means that every discovery request, response, or objection should be grounded on a theory that is reasonable under the precedents or a good faith belief as to what should be the law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).