Michael v. Crescent Pipe Line Co.
Citations
- 159 Pa. 99
- 28 A. 204
- 1893 Pa. LEXIS 1483
Syllabus
<p>Eminent domain — Market value — Opinion of witness.</p> <p>An essential test of the competency of witnesses called to give an opinion in respect to the market value of land in condemnation proceedings, is , that they should affirmatively appear to have actual personal knowledge of the facts affecting the subject-matter of the inquiry.</p> <p>Such witnesses should have a sufficient knowledge of the market value of the land estimated upon a fair consideration of the land, the extent and condition of its improvements, its quantity and productive qualities, and the uses to which it may reasonably be applied, taken with the general selling price of lands in the neighborhood at the time.</p> <p>Eminent domain — Bond—Damages—Art. 16, § 8, Const.</p> <p>Damages in condemnation proceedings are not limited by the amount of the bond given by the company seeking to condemn the land, as article 16, § 8, of the constitution provides that the amount on appeal from assessments shall be determined by a jury according to the course of the common law.</p>
Judges: Dean, Green, Mitchell, Sterrett, Thompson, Williams
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Kemble's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1924-05-12· cited 35×
- Friday v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1903-01-05· cited 32×
- Hoffman v. Berwind-White Coal Mining Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1920-01-05· cited 29×
- White v. Western Allegheny RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1909-01-04· cited 23×
- Davis v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1906-05-24· cited 18×
- Pittsburgh Railways Co. v. Port of Allegheny County AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1964-07-30· cited 17×
- Markowitz v. Pittsburg & Connellsville RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1907-01-07· cited 16×
- Stevenson v. East Deer TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1954-11-08· cited 14×
- Hill v. Oakmont BoroughSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1911-07-13· cited 10×
- Parry v. Cambria & Indiana RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1915-01-02· cited 8×
- Grier v. Borough of HomesteadSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1898-02-19· cited 8×
- Elgin Nat. Watch Co. v. Elgin Clock Co.D. Delaware· 1928-05-24· cited 6×
- Galbraith v. Philadelphia Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1896-07-16· cited 5×
- Mewes v. Crescent Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1895-10-07· cited 3×
- Atwater Kent Mfg. Co. v. United StatesE.D. Pennsylvania· 1943-12-31· cited 2×
- Tannehill v. Philadelphia Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1896-07-16
- Borough of Austin v. A. & P. Corrugated Box Corp.Lycoming County Court of Common Pleas· 1947-08-12
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.