Skip to main content

Merrill v. Merrill

Citations

  • 71 So. 2d 44
  • 260 Ala. 408
  • 1954 Ala. LEXIS 301

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “[n]o-tice does have influence on the question of laches”
  • stating that the doctrine of laches does not depend on any particular period of time, \but is a principle of good conscience dependent upon the facts of each case\
  • noting that ‘absence of notice’ does not control the application of the rule, and that ‘[n]otice does have influence on the question of laches, but not on [repose]’
  • stating that the doctrine of laches does not depend on any particular period of time, “but is a principle of good conscience dependent upon the facts of each case”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Livingston, Lawson, Stakely, Merrill

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.