Mercer v. Borden

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Since the definition of ‘employer’ in the FMLA is identical to the definition of ‘employer’ in the FLSA, the Court holds that individuals are potentially subject to liability under the FMLA. The plain language of the FMLA appears to compel this result.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Joey L. Mitchell v. Glenn Chapman
  Sixth Circuit· 2003-12-23· cited 270×
• Morrow v. Putnam
  D. Nevada· 2001-06-12· cited 25×
• Fraternal Order of Police Barkley Lodge 60, Inc. v. Fletcher
  W.D. Kentucky· 2008-02-20· cited 8×
• Longstreth v. Copple
  N.D. Iowa· 2000-06-26· cited 7×
• Leonard v. McMorris
  D. Colorado· 2000-06-29· cited 7×
• Bonzani v. Shinseki
  E.D. California· 2012-09-11· cited 1×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Phyllis Miller v. Maxwell's International Inc., Dba Maxwell's Plum, Debtor in Possession Carlo Galazzo, Gen. Mgt., Dino La Rosa Don Bohn Don Schupak
  Ninth Circuit· 1993-04-19· cited 636×
• Falk v. Brennan
  Supreme Court· 1973-12-05· cited 254×
• Johnson v. A.P. Products, Ltd.
  S.D. New York· 1996-08-06· cited 47×
• Freemon v. Foley
  N.D. Illinois· 1995-11-08· cited 36×
• Stubl v. T.A. Systems, Inc.
  E.D. Michigan· 1997-11-12· cited 34×
• Frizzell v. Southwest Motor Freight, Inc.
  E.D. Tennessee· 1995-11-20· cited 27×
• Waters v. Baldwin County
  S.D. Alabama· 1996-06-20· cited 14×