Skip to main content
· 8/6/1996

Johnson v. A.P. Products, Ltd.

Citations

  • 934 F. Supp. 625
  • 3 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 914
  • 5 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1669
  • 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11593
  • 69 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 44,441
  • 1996 WL 459931

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • denying motion to dismiss FMLA claim where allegations “indicate[d] some control [by defendant] over [plaintiffl’s employment”
  • dismissing claim against individual defendant because complaint alleged only that the defendant was a manager, and that she and the defendant company fired plaintiff
  • dismissing claims against a defendant in her individual capacity because Title VII did not subject her to individual liability
  • neither employee’s pregnancy nor its resultant complications constituted disability under ADA
  • “In determining whether, as a matter of economic reality, an entity is an employer . . . courts focus on whether the alleged employer has some degree of control over the terms and conditions of employment[, including] . . . whether the alleged employer: (1

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Parker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.