Skip to main content

Mendoza v. State

Citations

  • 81 So. 3d 579
  • 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 3171
  • 2012 WL 635803

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that a strategic or tactical decision is not a valid basis for an ineffective assistance of counsel claim unless no competent counsel would have employed such tactics
  • noting that a strategic or tactical decision is not a valid basis for an ineffective assistance of counsel claim unless no competent counsel would have employed such tactics
  • “[I]f counsel conducts a reasonable investigation of a potential witness, the subsequent decision not to call such a witness is ‘virtually unchallengeable.’”
  • “[N]ot only is Mendoza unable to rebut the presumption that counsel’s decision was reasonable and strategic, Mendoza’s express agreement to such a decision is fatal to his claim of ineffective assistance of counsel.”
  • “[N]ot only is Mendoza unable to rebut the presumption that counsel’s decision was reasonable and strategic, Mendoza’s express agreement to such a decision is fatal to his claim of ineffective assistance of counsel.”
  • “[N]ot only is Mendoza unable to rebut the presumption that counsel's decision was reasonable and strategic, Mendoza's express agreement to such a decision is fatal to his claim of ineffective assistance of counsel.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cortiñas, Emas, Fernandez

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.