Skip to main content
· 7/2/1992

Melnyk v. Adria Laboratories

Citations

  • 799 F. Supp. 301
  • 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10584
  • 62 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 73
  • 1992 WL 166850

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • one statement, not directed at plaintiff, that company wanted young and energetic salespeople, was insufficient to demonstrate that articulated reason for discharge was pretextual

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Skretny

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.