Melendez v. Beal

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that filing of suit 15 months after discovering wrong was not unreasonable when patient underwent procedure giving rise to complaint 13 years prior
• holding that filing of suit 15 months after discovering -wrong was not unreasonable when patient underwent procedure giving rise to complaint 13 years prior
• applying Texas law and holding a fifteen-month delay is unreasonable as a matter of law
• 13 months after discovery of malpractice held reasonable
• limitation unconstitutional to unknowing patient

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).