Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2/22/1994
Mejia v. Commonwealth
Citations
- 441 S.E.2d 41
- 17 Va. App. 749
- 10 Va. Law Rep. 929
- 1994 Va. App. LEXIS 77
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that officer seized appellant without first having attempted “a less intrusive alternative or explaining why such less intrusive means were impractical”
- finding no reasonable basis for seizure when sole reason for taking hold of appellant was appellant’s posture in preventing officer from exiting his police vehicle after being summoned by the officer to the vehicle
- officer unlawfully seized appellant without first attempting “less intrusive alternative or explaining why such less intrusive means were impractical”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Fitzpatrick
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court· 1980-06-30· cited 6,313×
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1979-01-15· cited 6,103×
- United States v. HensleySupreme Court· 1985-01-08· cited 2,340×
- Fore v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 1980-04-18· cited 284×
- Servis v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1988-07-05· cited 274×
- Williams v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1987-03-17· cited 209×
- Leeth v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 1982-03-12· cited 62×
- Motley v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1993-11-23· cited 50×
- Moss v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1988-10-18· cited 46×
- McCoy v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1986-05-06· cited 42×
- Quigley v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1992-03-03· cited 41×
- Wells v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1988-07-05· cited 36×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.