Skip to main content

Mejia v. Commonwealth

Citations

  • 441 S.E.2d 41
  • 17 Va. App. 749
  • 10 Va. Law Rep. 929
  • 1994 Va. App. LEXIS 77

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that officer seized appellant without first having attempted “a less intrusive alternative or explaining why such less intrusive means were impractical”
  • finding no reasonable basis for seizure when sole reason for taking hold of appellant was appellant’s posture in preventing officer from exiting his police vehicle after being summoned by the officer to the vehicle
  • officer unlawfully seized appellant without first attempting “less intrusive alternative or explaining why such less intrusive means were impractical”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fitzpatrick

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.