Meiying Zhao v. Sessions

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that creditors have a “responsibility to diligently investigate what claims they may have against the debt- or.”
• stating “a lack of notice of the character of the claims also should not violate due process and prevent discharge of the claims. A claimant that receives notice of bankruptcy proceedings has a duty to reasonably investigate what debts it is owed”
• “creditors are not relieved of their responsibility to diligently investigate what claims they may have against the debtor—a lack of particularity in the notice will not defeat discharge if the claims were ascertainable to the claimant through reasonable efforts”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).