Illinois Supreme Court· 9/11/1997
Meh v. Lh
Citations
- 685 N.E.2d 335
- 177 Ill. 2d 207
- 226 Ill. Dec. 232
- 1997 Ill. LEXIS 409
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that earlier repeal of 12-year repose period under statute could not, consistent with due process, operate to revive claims of childhood sexual abuse, if claims were time-barred under older version of statute
- noting that in any case it would defeat the purpose to allow a period greater than the repose period itself of 12 years, but that reasonableness should not be defined by that statutory repose period and finding the nearly 4 year delay not reasonable
- discussing 735 Ill. Comp. Stat. 5/13-202.2(b) (West 1992); Bernie v. Blue Cloud Abbey, 821 N.W.2d 224, 230 n.9 (S.D. 2012) (discussing S.D. Codified Laws § 26-10-25 (West 1991)
- discussing 735 Ill. Comp. Stat. 5/13-202.2(b) (West 1992); Bernie v. Blue Cloud Abbey, 821 N.W.2d 224, 230 n.9 (S.D. 2012) (discussing S.D. Codified Laws § 26-10-25 (West 1991)
- discussing 735 Ill. Comp. Stat. 5/13-202.2(b) (West 1992); Bernie v. Blue Cloud Abbey, 821 N.W.2d 224, 230 n.9 (S.D. 2012) (discussing S.D. Codified Laws § 26-10-25 (West 1991)
- applying the rule that the expiration of the statute of limitations creates a protectable property right to conclude that the expiration of the statute of repose creates a similar right
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Harrison
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Clay v. KuhlIllinois Supreme Court· 2000-01-21· cited 165×
- Sundance Homes, Inc. v. County of Du PageIllinois Supreme Court· 2001-02-16· cited 128×
- Charles Anderson v. Catholic Bishop of ChicagoSeventh Circuit· 2014-07-02· cited 49×
- Perlstein v. WolkIllinois Supreme Court· 2006-02-17· cited 41×
- Wisniewski v. Diocese of BellevilleAppellate Court of Illinois· 2011-01-13· cited 26×
- In re Individual 35W Bridge LitigationSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2011-11-30· cited 25×
- Meyers v. UnderwoodAppellate Court of Illinois· 2000-06-27· cited 20×
- Softcheck v. ImeschAppellate Court of Illinois· 2006-09-01· cited 19×
- Anderson v. Holy SeeN.D. Illinois· 2013-03-19· cited 13×
- Galloway v. Diocese of Springfield in IllinoisAppellate Court of Illinois· 2006-08-17· cited 11×
- Galloway v. DIOCESE OF SPRINGFIELDAppellate Court of Illinois· 2006-08-17· cited 10×
- Parks v. KownackiAppellate Court of Illinois· 1999-06-01· cited 10×
- Kuch v. Catholic Bishop of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois· 2006-05-30· cited 9×
- Doe v. Diocese of DallasAppellate Court of Illinois· 2008-03-07· cited 8×
- Clay v. KuhlAppellate Court of Illinois· 1998-06-22· cited 4×
- Johnson v. AugustiniansAppellate Court of Illinois· 2009-11-25· cited 4×
- Anderson v. Holy SeeN.D. Illinois· 2012-07-19· cited 4×
- M.K. v. L.C.Appellate Court of Illinois· 2009-01-09· cited 2×
- Mk v. LcAppellate Court of Illinois· 2009-01-09· cited 1×
- Doe A. v. Diocese of DallasAppellate Court of Illinois· 2008-03-07
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Golla v. General Motors Corp.Illinois Supreme Court· 1995-10-19· cited 213×
- Mega v. Holy Cross HospitalIllinois Supreme Court· 1986-02-06· cited 160×
- Board of Education v. BlodgettIllinois Supreme Court· 1895-01-14· cited 84×
- Sepmeyer v. HolmanIllinois Supreme Court· 1994-10-27· cited 54×
- M.E.H. v. L.H.Illinois Supreme Court· 1997-09-11· cited 45×
- Phillips v. JohnsonAppellate Court of Illinois· 1992-08-26· cited 39×
- Costello v. Unarco Industries, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court· 1986-02-06· cited 36×
- Mary J. Boggs v. Charles S. AdamsSeventh Circuit· 1995-01-17· cited 20×
- Meh v. LhAppellate Court of Illinois· 1996-08-28· cited 6×
- People ex rel. Skinner v. ScottAppellate Court of Illinois· 1988-08-01· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.