Charles Anderson v. Catholic Bishop of Chicago

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a defendant did not waive its right to assert a statute-of-repose defense by offering settlement to the plaintiff
• holding district court properly dismissed class claims upon dismissal of named plaintiff’s claims based on statute of limitations and where Plaintiff had not moved for class discovery prior to dismissal
• affirming denial of Rule 60(b) relief where movant failed to show reasonable diligence regarding supposedly new evidence
• affirming denial of Rule 60(b) relief where movant failed to show reasonable diligence regarding supposedly new evidence
• affirming denial of Rule 60(b) relief where movant failed to show reasonable diligence regarding supposedly new evidence
• dismissals without prejudice based on problems that readily can be fixed typically are not final, appealable orders unless the statute of limitations would preclude refiling

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).