Skip to main content

Medina v. State

Citations

  • 828 N.E.2d 427
  • 2005 Ind. App. LEXIS 944
  • 2005 WL 1303116

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that culpability required for child molesting conviction is knowingly or intentionally
  • observing, with respect to class A felony child molesting, “[q]uite simply, it is impossible for one to accidentally commit the acts committed by Medina”
  • finding harmless error in the trial court’s failure to give a mens rea instruction with regard to a class A felony child molesting charge
  • “‘[r]eversal without any consideration of the effect of the error upon the verdict would send the case back for retrial retrial not focused at all on the issue of [the excluded element], but on contested issues on which the jury was properly instructed.’”
  • some citations omitted and citing in part State v. Keihn, 542 N.E.2d 963, 967-968 (Ind. 1989) (where the legislature fails to specify a level of mental culpability with respect to an offense, a level of mental culpability of knowingly will be presumed to be required)
  • some citations omitted and citing in part State v. Keihn, 542 N.E.2d 963, 967-968 (Ind. 1989) (where the legislature fails to specify a level of mental culpability with respect to an offense, a level of mental culpability of knowingly will be presumed to be required)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mathias, Bailey, Sullivan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.