Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Tenth Circuit· 11/14/2017

Medina v. Choate

Citations

  • 875 F.3d 1025

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a petition for a writ of habeas corpus brought under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 “is not a proper avenue of relief for federal prisoners awaiting federal trial.”
  • concluding that a federal prisoner awaiting trial “is limited to proceeding by motion to the trial court, followed by a possible appeal after judgment, before resorting to habeas relief” (citation omitted)
  • concluding that a federal prisoner awaiting trial “is limited to proceeding by motion to the trial court, followed by a possible appeal after judgment, before resorting to habeas relief” (citation omitted)
  • adopting \the general rule that § 2241 is not a proper avenue of relief for federal prisoners awaiting federal trial\
  • adopting “the general rule that § 2241 is not a proper avenue of relief for federal prisoners awaiting federal trial”
  • adopting “the general rule that § 2241 is not a proper avenue of relief for federal prisoners awaiting federal trial”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hartz, Holmes, Bacharach

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Medina v. Choate

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.