Walck v. Edmondson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that section 2241 “is the proper avenue by which to challenge pretrial detention”
• holding that section 2241 “is the proper avenue by which to challenge pretrial detention”
• holding double jeopardy protections applied when prosecution knew during voir dire that pregnant witness was in labor but still allowed jury to be sworn
• stating that 28 U.S.C. § 2241 “is the proper avenue by which to challenge pretrial detention.”
• stating that 28 U.S.C. § 2241 “is the proper avenue by which to challenge pretrial detention.”
• holding double jeopardy protections applied when prosecution knew during voir dire that pregnant witness was in labor but still allowed jury to be sworn

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).