Medill v. Snyder
Citations
- 71 Kan. 590
- 81 P. 216
- 1905 Kan. LEXIS 189
Syllabus
<p>SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.</p> <p>Wills- — Contest of Probate — Limitation of Action. The time limited by the statute of wills for bringing a suit in the district court to contest a will is not extended by section 23 of the code of civil procedure (Gen. Stat. 1901, sec. 4451), providing that if any action be commenced within due time and judgment thereon for the plaintiff be reversed, or if the plaintiff fail in such action otherwise than upon the merits, and the time limited for the same shall have expired, the plaintiff, or if he die and the cause of action survive, his representatives, may commence a new action within one year after the reversal or failure.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- proceeding to contest a will
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Burch, Cunningham, Greene, Johnston, Mason, Smith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
16 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Rishel v. County of McPhersonSupreme Court of Kansas· 1927-02-12· cited 26×
- Terrell v. Ready Mixed Concrete Co.Supreme Court of Kansas· 1953-06-06· cited 21×
- Dewey v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Firefighters Pension & Retirement SystemSupreme Court of Oklahoma· 2001-05-08· cited 21×
- Lakeview Village, Inc. v. BOARD OF JOHNSON CTY. COMM'RSSupreme Court of Kansas· 1983-02-19· cited 19×
- Bowles v. PortelanceSupreme Court of Kansas· 1937-05-08· cited 14×
- In Re Cassidy's EstateArizona Supreme Court· 1954-06-01· cited 13×
- Serrault v. PriceSupreme Court of Kansas· 1928-03-10· cited 13×
- Kunze v. KunzeSupreme Court of Kansas· 1937-01-23· cited 12×
- Hanson v. HoffmanSupreme Court of Kansas· 1939-06-10· cited 8×
- In Re Birdview Satellite Communications, Inc.D. Kansas· 1988-03-10· cited 7×
- Hodge v. HodgeSupreme Court of Kansas· 1963-05-11· cited 5×
- Ferrier v. FerrierSupreme Court of Kansas· 1920-12-11· cited 5×
- Vanderwerken v. MarksSupreme Court of Kansas· 1933-07-08· cited 2×
- Cassidy v. DowdArizona Supreme Court· 1954-06-01· cited 1×
- Anderson v. PiperSupreme Court of Kansas· 1920-06-05
- McVeigh v. FettermanOhio Supreme Court· 1917-02-13
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Gaines v. FuentesSupreme Court· 1876-03-20· cited 191×
- Rodman v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas· 1902-11-08· cited 64×
- State v. McGlynn & ButlerCalifornia Supreme Court· 1862-07-01· cited 53×
- Luther v. LutherIllinois Supreme Court· 1887-09-26· cited 44×
- Tarver v. TarverSupreme Court· 1835-02-21· cited 35×
- Spaulding v. WhiteIllinois Supreme Court· 1898-04-21· cited 35×
- Meyer v. HendersonCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1899-02-01· cited 31×
- Wheeler v. WheelerIllinois Supreme Court· 1890-10-31· cited 27×
- Sinnet v. BowmanIllinois Supreme Court· 1894-06-19· cited 21×
- Holden v. MeadowsWisconsin Supreme Court· 1872-06-15· cited 18×
- Jele v. LembergerIllinois Supreme Court· 1896-11-09· cited 16×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.