Mears v. Mears

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• persuasive evidence of an understanding between husband and wife to change the status of their property will rebut the presumption arising from the form in which the property is held

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

44 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• See v. See
  California Supreme Court· 1966-07-01· cited 127×
• Frustuck v. City of Fairfax
  California Court of Appeal· 1963-01-28· cited 97×
• Kraus v. Willow Park Public Golf Course
  California Court of Appeal· 1977-09-15· cited 73×
• Templeton Feed & Grain v. Ralston Purina Co.
  California Supreme Court· 1968-10-25· cited 67×
• In Re Marriage of Rossin
  California Court of Appeal· 2009-03-24· cited 57×
• In Re Marriage of Jafeman
  California Court of Appeal· 1972-12-08· cited 55×
• Somps v. Somps
  California Court of Appeal· 1967-04-24· cited 37×
• Trollope v. Jeffries
  California Court of Appeal· 1976-02-26· cited 35×
• Lovetro v. Steers
  California Court of Appeal· 1965-05-19· cited 33×
• In Re Marriage of Grinius
  California Court of Appeal· 1985-04-16· cited 29×
• Estate of Hoffman
  California Court of Appeal· 1963-03-07· cited 28×
• In the Matter of Cecilia May Paderewski (Bankrupt). C. J. Paderewski, and v. John H. Barrett, Oscar F. Irwin, and Lewis H. Silverberg, Co-Trustees And
  Ninth Circuit· 1977-11-28· cited 23×
• In Re Marriage of Cosgrove
  California Court of Appeal· 1972-08-24· cited 21×
• Blackburn v. Drake
  California Court of Appeal· 1963-01-15· cited 21×
• Hansen v. Hansen
  California Court of Appeal· 1965-04-14· cited 20×
• Montalvo v. Madera Unified School District Board of Education
  California Court of Appeal· 1971-11-17· cited 18×
• Block v. Laboratory Procedures, Inc.
  California Court of Appeal· 1970-06-23· cited 17×
• Grant v. Woods
  California Court of Appeal· 1977-05-24· cited 16×
• Haldeman v. Haldeman
  California Court of Appeal· 1962-04-17· cited 16×
• Chapman v. Tarentola
  California Court of Appeal· 1960-11-30· cited 16×

Cites

53 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Estate of Bristol v. Young
  California Supreme Court· 1943-12-01· cited 508×
• Primm v. Primm
  California Supreme Court· 1956-06-28· cited 243×
• Gudelj v. Gudelj
  California Supreme Court· 1953-07-03· cited 208×
• Tomaier v. Tomaier
  California Supreme Court· 1944-03-02· cited 181×
• De Burgh v. De Burgh
  California Supreme Court· 1952-11-25· cited 153×
• Huber v. Huber
  California Supreme Court· 1946-03-27· cited 118×
• American Enterprise, Inc. v. Van Winkle
  California Supreme Court· 1952-07-08· cited 107×
• People v. La MacChia
  California Supreme Court· 1953-12-15· cited 97×
• Long Beach City High School District v. Stewart
  California Supreme Court· 1947-10-24· cited 92×
• Thomasset v. Thomasset
  California Court of Appeal· 1953-12-17· cited 83×
• Grolemund v. Cafferata
  California Supreme Court· 1941-03-28· cited 76×
• Socol v. King
  California Supreme Court· 1950-11-13· cited 73×
• Falk v. Falk
  California Court of Appeal· 1941-12-29· cited 61×
• La Jolla Casa deManana v. Hopkins
  California Court of Appeal· 1950-07-07· cited 57×
• Rauer's Collection Co. v. Higgins
  California Court of Appeal· 1948-08-20· cited 54×
• Wilson v. Wilson
  California Court of Appeal· 1946-09-18· cited 53×
• Oldis v. La Societe Francaise De Bienfaisance Mutuelle
  California Court of Appeal· 1955-01-27· cited 51×
• Schubert v. Reich
  California Supreme Court· 1950-10-31· cited 50×
• Rozan v. Rozan
  California Supreme Court· 1957-11-05· cited 49×
• Bekins Van Lines, Inc. v. Johnson
  California Supreme Court· 1942-11-02· cited 48×