Skip to main content

Grant v. Woods

Citations

  • 71 Cal. App. 3d 647
  • 139 Cal. Rptr. 533
  • 71 Cal. App. 2d 647
  • 1977 Cal. App. LEXIS 1645

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[T]he carriers were not involved in a separate and distinct occupation of their own. To the contrary, they were essential to Grant’s business.”
  • “[T]he belief of the parties as to the legal effect of their relationship is not controlling if as a matter of law a different relationship exists.”
  • “[T]he belief of the parties as to the legal effect of their relationship is not controlling if as a matter of law a different relationship exists.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Reynoso

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.