District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 12/30/1986
Meaders v. United States
Citations
- 519 A.2d 1248
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- testimony of police detective did not show sufficient knowledge of the business and recording practices of hospital to permit admission of medical report on sexual assault victim
- \[p]rejudice results when cross-examination probes into the private life of a rape victim\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Pryor, Terry, Gallagher
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Roundtree v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1990-10-02· cited 117×
- Davis v. WinfieldDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1995-09-21· cited 55×
- Battle v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1993-08-30· cited 43×
- Brewer v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1989-05-31· cited 33×
- Woodward & Lothrop v. HillaryDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1991-09-26· cited 32×
- Brown v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2004-01-08· cited 32×
- Gardner v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1997-05-29· cited 31×
- Dutch v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2010-06-24· cited 19×
- Hagins v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1994-03-31· cited 16×
- Matter of GahanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1987-09-30· cited 10×
- Keene v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1995-06-29· cited 9×
- Watts v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2009-05-21· cited 4×
- Allstate Insurance v. CurtisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2001-09-20· cited 2×
Cites
25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court· 1986-04-07· cited 7,102×
- Alford v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1931-02-24· cited 1,352×
- Springer v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1978-06-06· cited 182×
- William J. Gass v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1969-01-29· cited 141×
- United States v. Oscar Ordonez, German Hernandez Garcia, AKA Jaime RiveraNinth Circuit· 1984-07-11· cited 134×
- Itel Capital Corporation, a Corporation, Cross-Appellant v. Cups Coal Company, Incorporated, a Corporation and Herman Mulvehill, Cross-AppelleesEleventh Circuit· 1983-06-23· cited 104×
- United States v. Frank BakerD.C. Circuit· 1982-11-09· cited 87×
- United States v. Luis Esteban Veytia-BravoFifth Circuit· 1979-11-05· cited 63×
- United States v. Thomas HoughtonFirst Circuit· 1977-05-20· cited 55×
- McLean v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1977-09-02· cited 46×
- Francisco Elizarraras v. Bank of El PasoFifth Circuit· 1980-11-24· cited 41×
- Mitchell v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1979-10-17· cited 41×
- Schroud v. Milwaukee County Department of Public WelfareSupreme Court· 1972-10-10· cited 38×
- United States v. Morris LealNinth Circuit· 1975-01-06· cited 33×
- United States v. Joseph Lamar JonesFifth Circuit· 1977-06-20· cited 30×
- Smith v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1974-12-27· cited 28×
- United States v. Wallace Murphy Plum, A/K/A Porky PlumTenth Circuit· 1977-07-11· cited 26×
- DELL PUB. CO., INC. v. WhedonS.D. New York· 1984-01-11· cited 23×
- United States v. StampD.C. Circuit· 1971-12-20· cited 23×
- In re D.M.C.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1986-01-29· cited 21×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.