McWilliams v. Kentucky Heating Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• enforcing exclusion with identical language and finding that the insured’s “smaller premium came with the tradeoff that [the designated ongoing operations] fell- outside the policy’s coverage”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).