City of Louisville v. Arrowsmith

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defendant’s general counsel aided and abetted harassment and discrimination where, after receiving the plaintiff’s complaints of harassment by a supervisor, he failed to investigate the complaints
• noting that “courts have found that a failure to investigate can constitute ‘active participation’ to support an ‘aiding and abetting’ claim,” and collecting cases
• finding that calling plaintiff a “ ‘liar,’ or ‘coinplaining about every single thing,’ ” are not “ ‘petty slights’ or ‘minor annoyances’and give rise to a claim of retaliation.
• “courts have found that a failure to investigate can constitute ‘active participation’ to support an ‘aiding and abetting’ claim”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).