Skip to main content
· 10/20/1994

McSwiggan v. Kaminsky

Citations

  • 231 Conn. 934
  • 649 A.2d 256
  • 1994 Conn. LEXIS 387

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • deeming it “unnecessary for the Court to address plaintiffs’ vagueness claim insofar as it relates to the regulation of attorneys or law firms”
  • “‘Impairment’ occurs when the law prohibits performance of an obligation and extinguishes available remedies for nonperformance.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.