McNeely v. Hiatt

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that someone appearing “fit and active” does not make them immune to undue influence
• award of attorney fees improper where party failed to provide any notice of intent to seek attorney fees

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Lumbermen's v. Dakota Ventures
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1998-11-25· cited 19×
• Sangster v. Dillard
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1997-01-29· cited 5×
• Wedemeyer v. Nike Ihm, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2022-05-25· cited 3×
• Asbridge v. Longoria
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-07-02

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Rogers v. Rogers
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1984-11-21· cited 19×
• McNeely v. Hiatt
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1996-01-03· cited 11×
• Jones v. Kuhn
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1982-09-15· cited 6×