· 11/25/1998
Lumbermen's v. Dakota Ventures
Citations
- 971 P.2d 430
- 157 Or. App. 370
- 1998 Ore. App. LEXIS 2128
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that ORCP 12 B did not excuse noncompliance with ORCP 68 C(2) where the defendant “had several earlier opportunities to allege a right to attorney fees but failed to plead that entitlement in either the original answer or the answer to plaintiffs amended complaint”
- purpose of ORCP 68 C(2) is to ensure that opponents are given adequate notice of a party’s intention to seek attorney fees
- “Thus, we look to whether plaintiff was fairly alerted to the fact that attorney fees would be sought [by defendant] and whether the defect in the pleading prejudiced plaintiff.”
- ‘We look to whether plaintiff was fairly alerted to the fact that attorney fees would be sought and whether the defect in the pleading prejudiced plaintiff.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: De Muniz, Haselton, Linder
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.