Skip to main content
· 11/25/1998

Lumbermen's v. Dakota Ventures

Citations

  • 971 P.2d 430
  • 157 Or. App. 370
  • 1998 Ore. App. LEXIS 2128

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that ORCP 12 B did not excuse noncompliance with ORCP 68 C(2) where the defendant “had several earlier opportunities to allege a right to attorney fees but failed to plead that entitlement in either the original answer or the answer to plaintiffs amended complaint”
  • purpose of ORCP 68 C(2) is to ensure that opponents are given adequate notice of a party’s intention to seek attorney fees
  • “Thus, we look to whether plaintiff was fairly alerted to the fact that attorney fees would be sought [by defendant] and whether the defect in the pleading prejudiced plaintiff.”
  • ‘We look to whether plaintiff was fairly alerted to the fact that attorney fees would be sought and whether the defect in the pleading prejudiced plaintiff.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: De Muniz, Haselton, Linder

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.