Skip to main content

McNeal v. State

Citations

  • 435 S.E.2d 47
  • 263 Ga. 397
  • 93 Fulton County D. Rep. 3555
  • 1993 Ga. LEXIS 677

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • remanding for the in-camera hearing required by Tribble v. State, 248 Ga. 274, 280 S.E.2d 352 (1981), to determine the State's compliance with Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963)
  • remanding for the in-camera hearing required by Tribble v. State, 248 Ga. 274 (280 SE2d 352) (1981), to determine the State’s compliance with Brady v. Maryland, 373 U. S. 83 (83 SC 1194, 10 LE2d 215) (1963)
  • “The essence of a sequential charge is judicial direction to consider possible verdicts in a particular sequence”
  • “The essence of a sequential charge is judicial direction to consider possible verdicts in a particular sequence”
  • case remanded for post-trial Tribble in camera review
  • case remanded for post-trial Tribble in camera review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Benham

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.