Skip to main content

McMurphy v. State

Citations

  • 757 A.2d 1043
  • 171 Vt. 9
  • 2000 Vt. LEXIS 162

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that plaintiffs lacked standing to bring claim that city breached its contractual agreement with state to maintain highway intersection because plaintiffs were only incidental beneficiaries to contract
  • holding that plaintiffs lacked standing to bring claim that city breached its contractual agreement with state to maintain highway intersection because plaintiffs were only incidental beneficiaries to contract
  • allowing an injured motorist to proceed on a negligence claim based on alleged failure to comply with design standards that the State clearly intended to comply with
  • examining contract to determine whether plaintiffs’ daughter was a third-party beneficiary of agreement
  • “We presume that language [in a statute] is inserted advisedly and that the Legislature did not intend to create surplusage.”
  • “The determination of whether a party may be classified as a third-party beneficiary, as opposed to an incidental beneficiary, is based on the original contracting parties’ intention.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dooley, Morse, Johnson, Skoglund, Gibson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

36 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.